Thanks for allowing me to speak. I'm filling in for Matt today.
I would think, with all respect, Mr. Davies, this should be referred to the subcommittee so that it and other priorities of the committee can be hashed out properly there, rather than our committing to it right now, because there are still the supplementary estimates to be looked after, and the main estimates. With all of the breaks, that's almost going to take us to the end of June.
Really, if you want to lay out priorities, and if this is the priority, I think maybe it needs to be discussed at the subcommittee as it traditionally is, and not through a motion on the very first day the committee has formed. If it's a fulsome study that everybody agrees needs to be done, generally it would be discussed by the chair, the vice-chairs or whoever represents the four parties at the subcommittee, not in a process like this.
Once the schedule is laid out in the subcommittee, that gets presented back and then everyone can hash out from there that priority, or others.
Wrapping up, just refer it to the subcommittee and lay out the business that way rather than pushing it through by a motion.