In response to that, because I was one of the people who said I'd like to read the report, I don't intend to question the conclusions of the report. It's somebody else's study. It's like me as a doctor. I may not agree with one of my colleague's decisions, but I respect them for making the decision and I let them make the decision. My thinking is not to reopen the issue, but it's just part of the democratic process that if our name is going on it, we at least understand what's in the report.
My own thinking had been that if had we one week for each of the reports, then we could read them and understand them, just because our names will be going on them.