I think that, again, the one-size-fits-all thing has to be abandoned. What we're finding with veterans, first responders and front-line workers is that quite often the culture in these workforces is such that you shouldn't ask for help or your job might be in danger if you disclose a vulnerability.
What's proving to be very successful with those populations is peer support, communities of support. What I think the federal government can do is set up an infrastructure. Peer support works with the support of technology, because you can scale it. You can scale it in a way that's anonymous, because part of the concern when reaching out for care is that it might be somebody you know in the neighbourhood or rural area, especially with peer support, but with technology, you can make that anonymous, and you can also scale it to the point that there are enough people available to provide support and a listening ear.
What we find with peer support programs in volunteer workforces is that the turnover is high. This is not a problem, because when you train a peer support workforce, they may not work for a long period of time, but they're still within our population, able to provide informal support because they've learned skills on how to help each other.
The point of scaling, because the turnover is high, is that you need to have an infrastructure in place that continually replenishes and teaches mental health first aid for peer support workers.