I just want to say that it was a terrific initiative. In our policy brief to the standing committee, we mentioned that there could be invigorated opportunities to build on that earlier precedent. We didn't see those dollars going towards children. I think it was actually a really helpful move by the federal government to put strings attached for mental health, but the majority didn't go near children.
What I'm suggesting, and what the data we presented in our brief to you suggests, is further earmarking for children's mental health. Otherwise, kids may never see the benefit. It's a great form of initiative to do that earmarking so that we increase mental health spending.