No, that's not the case. I read a direct quote where both groups were speaking about efficacy. One was not talking about use and the other about efficacy; both were talking about efficacy. NACI said there's no sufficient evidence; Health Canada said there is.
I'm going to move toward what Dr. Nathalie Grandvaux, professor in biochemistry and molecular medicine, told this committee this week. She said:
PHAC authorizes vaccines based on the clinical trial data, and the NACI subsequently adjusts the recommendations for their use based on real-life data as it becomes available.
It goes without saying that the different messages emitted by these two organizations lately induce a major confusion that is incomprehensible for the majority of the population. This is without taking into account the additional confusion induced by the different opinions of the provincial advisory committees.
...It is important to understand that inconsistent messages will likely lead to a loss of confidence in the population in the vaccination campaign and one cannot risk losing the adhesion of the population to immunization with the safe and effective vaccines that we have.
Is she wrong, Ms. Elmslie?