Okay. Obviously, the National Advisory Committee on Immunization, or NACI, is telling us that the vaccine is 43% effective. Isn't that right?
Who should take the advisory committee into account? The Public Health Agency of Canada must deal with a pandemic. It has two bodies. The goal is to get vaccines, but when it comes to the AstraZeneca vaccine, there's some passing the buck.
Some people in Quebec say that the vaccine was approved. However, it was approved without any warning about its effectiveness for people aged 65 and over. When we're told about the relevance of the vaccine, we hear that this falls under a vaccination strategy based on the scarcity of the resource.
If the resource isn't in short supply, is the approval granted anyway? Is this done without any warning? In other words, why was this vaccine approved?