You're saying that, even though the vaccine is 43% effective in people aged 65 and over, it prevents serious forms of the illness.
Is the decision to offer this vaccine optimal for all people? In a way, doesn't the decision to offer it without a warning create uncertainty for people who are feeling uncertain right now?
We learned today that there was an issue. Who will make a decision? Certainly not the National Advisory Committee on Immunization, or NACI, because the committee is advisory.
Will it be the Public Health Agency of Canada, Health Canada?
Who will make the decision to suspend the use of this vaccine, as was done in Norway, Denmark and Iceland?
Why didn't you apply the precautionary principle?