Dr. Champagne, from the Association des médecins hématologues et oncologues du Québec, said that the effects would be felt over the next 10 years and would result in a 10% increase in the mortality rate. It was based on a publication of the British Medical Journal. Knowing that four weeks' delay implies an increase in mortality of between 6%, 8% and 10%, it's undeniable that resources must be increased at this time.
Earlier, the Canadian Federation of Nurses Unions told us about the labour shortage. Performing surgery that could solve cancer early still requires respiratory therapists and nurses, among others, in the operating room.
From a medical point of view, do you think it makes sense to say that health transfers will be increased substantially and repeatedly, but only after the pandemic?
That's why I was asking the question. When is “after”?
Does this make economic sense? We know that a colonoscopy costs $1,000. If it isn't done in time, the patient becomes a chronic disease patient who ends up in the system. System costs will increase over the next 10 years. Costs will skyrocket.
Is there a logical medical and economic case for a substantial and recurring post-pandemic investment?