The reason I ask is that it's not just an issue of expanding comparator countries. I don't think anybody can argue that expanding the present system—which has, I think, five to seven countries with two of the expensive two and 11-country comparisons that's much more representative—is....
Also, aren't there fundamental issues of transparency? How do we set appropriate pricing in this country if pharmaceutical companies are negotiating secret agreements, and then any attempt to shine a light on those agreements so that we can find out what actually is being paid is being resisted by the pharmaceutical industry? Who benefits from having private, secret prices paid when drugs are such a public necessity in this country?