I may be guilty of oversimplifying things, but I view the motions as being related. As was said, Mr. Barlow's motion did say that, if the law clerk didn't have the documents, please prioritize that the contract documents are forwarded to this committee, which is what we did. I have done some homework while we were talking, and that, indeed, is why these documents were sent directly to this committee and not to the law clerk.
Regardless, in terms of the redaction, it was the Department of PSPC that did the redaction. We are the contracting agent of the government, and we have a sense with our vaccine providers as to what is commercially sensitive and what is not. I do apologize, Mr. Chair, for being a little general in my language earlier. The documents were sent in response to the Barlow motion, but I do appreciate that the two are related.
I'll leave it there.