Thanks.
Again, I'm hoping that didn't eat up my time, with the member—I guess—forgetting the vote that just happened.
Mr. Stewart, in relation to that secure process and also in reference to the Speaker's ruling, at the time there was a reference to a previous ruling with respect to the Afghanistan war. However, a secure committee of Parliament with security clearance and the ability to meet in a secure setting to handle sensitive documents didn't exist at that time. Now that this process does exist, was this the rationale for using NSICOP, with all the secure protocols, to send all documents unredacted to a safe and secure setting, with members of Parliament from both Houses able to handle and understand the national security information in that secure manner?