Evidence of meeting #46 for Health in the 43rd Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was documents.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Jean-François Pagé
Daniel Therrien  Privacy Commissioner of Canada, Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
Philippe Dufresne  Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel, House of Commons
Caroline Maynard  Information Commissioner of Canada, Office of the Information Commissioner of Canada
Michel Bédard  Deputy Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel, Office of the Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel, House of Commons

5:05 p.m.

Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel, House of Commons

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Ron McKinnon

Pardon me, Ms. Rempel Garner, I've stopped your time. Your microphone is not connected properly.

5:05 p.m.

Conservative

Michelle Rempel Conservative Calgary Nose Hill, AB

It's going to be what it's going to be, Chair.

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Ron McKinnon

It's the interpreters who have the deepest concern about this. If you could just make sure that the sound is as good as we can make it for them, that would be good.

Have you verified that?

5:05 p.m.

Conservative

Michelle Rempel Conservative Calgary Nose Hill, AB

I'd just like to proceed if possible.

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Ron McKinnon

Okay, we are trying to look after the interpreters as well, but I will resume your time now.

Go ahead, please.

5:05 p.m.

Conservative

Michelle Rempel Conservative Calgary Nose Hill, AB

Thank you, Chair.

Mr. Dufresne, in terms of possible next options for recourse of the committee, I am looking at the matters that were disclosed this afternoon with regard to the fact that the government has apparently.... The Attorney General has filed an application in Federal Court requesting an order to seal documents related to the National Microbiology Laboratory on the transfer of Ebola.

Are you aware of this filing by the Attorney General?

5:10 p.m.

Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel, House of Commons

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

Michelle Rempel Conservative Calgary Nose Hill, AB

How unusual is this?

5:10 p.m.

Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel, House of Commons

Philippe Dufresne

From time to time there are proceedings in court. The role of my office in these proceedings is to represent the interests of the institution, the Speaker, and defending the privileges of the House. That's been done by my predecessors. It's been done by myself.

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

Michelle Rempel Conservative Calgary Nose Hill, AB

Thank you.

Has this ever happened before?

5:10 p.m.

Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel, House of Commons

Philippe Dufresne

In the specific context in terms of an order to produce documents, to my knowledge it has not.

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

Michelle Rempel Conservative Calgary Nose Hill, AB

Has the government taken the House to court over [Technical difficulty—Editor] documents [Technical difficulty—Editor] this Parliament?

5:10 p.m.

Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel, House of Commons

Philippe Dufresne

By this current Parliament, no.

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

Michelle Rempel Conservative Calgary Nose Hill, AB

Thank you.

What about previous sessions of this Parliament, such as the Speakers' Spotlight documents, for example?

5:10 p.m.

Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel, House of Commons

Philippe Dufresne

To my knowledge, no. This is something that we can look into and confirm in terms of precedence.

There have been precedents where privilege has been raised and determined in court.

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

Michelle Rempel Conservative Calgary Nose Hill, AB

My understanding is that Parliament is immune from judicial intervention. Is that correct?

5:10 p.m.

Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel, House of Commons

Philippe Dufresne

If a matter falls under parliamentary privilege, then the House will have exclusive authority. That's the position I will be taking.

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

Michelle Rempel Conservative Calgary Nose Hill, AB

Thank you.

Can you assure the members of the committee that the rights of Parliament will be defended against this court application from the government?

5:10 p.m.

Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel, House of Commons

Philippe Dufresne

I can confirm that I've been instructed by the Speaker of the House of Commons to challenge the jurisdiction of the court in this matter [Technical difficulty—Editor] parliamentary privilege.

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

Tony Van Bynen Liberal Newmarket—Aurora, ON

I have a point of order, Mr. Chair.

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Ron McKinnon

Mr. Van Bynen, go ahead on a point of order.

Ms. Rempel Garner, your time is stopped.

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

Tony Van Bynen Liberal Newmarket—Aurora, ON

My point is with respect to relevance, Mr. Chair. The issue we're discussing is not relative to HESA.

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

Michelle Rempel Conservative Calgary Nose Hill, AB

I would argue that it is directly material, Chair. It is directly related to the item at hand, but I understand—

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

Tony Van Bynen Liberal Newmarket—Aurora, ON

Mr. Chair, how are the documents relative to the Canada-China relationship?