My view is the committee could do that if it so stated in its decision. In my view, the committee decides, and ultimately the House decides what grounds it will accept.
In this instance, the House has agreed to certain grounds in the order. The motion talks about vetting in accordance with the parameters set out in the motion, so it appears to relate to those parameters, which would be the personal privacy, national security and the commercial matters.
Ultimately, that's for this committee to decide.