Mr. Chair, we have Ms. Rempel Garner's motion before us. I'm not sure whether Ms. Rempel Garner would agree to amend her motion. I will not repeat all the arguments made by my colleague Mr. Davies. I agree with them. On matters of substance, he always gives very good advice, keeping the committee on the right track.
That said, we have all prepared for this meeting. We clearly wanted two hours and we worked very hard to prepare for it. However, we did not have a session scheduled for the coming week. Some members of the committee—and I'm not the only one—also sit on the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, which is already scheduled to sit for two days next week.
I would like us to be able to include in Ms. Garner's motion the exclusion of the time slots for the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, taking into account the minister's availability. That way, next week, we can all participate and work together when the minister appears. Not all the work we have done will be done by others. At the same time, we will ensure that there will be no conflict in scheduling. I have been very flexible, and I'm open. I think it's very important that we stick with the motion asking the minister and all her officials to answer our questions for two hours.
Would Ms. Rempel Garner agree to that addition to the motion? If not, I will make a subamendment.