No, briefly, Mr. Chair, I have two things.
One is in respect to Mr. Van Bynen's comment. There are no ATIP criteria engaged by this. The House passed a motion that specified the grounds of redaction.
In the Access to Information Act, there are somewhere in the neighbourhood of 15 different criteria for redaction. The House did not adopt the ATIP criteria. It specified the grounds for redaction to the clerk, so that point should be clear.
Two, with respect to Mr. Thériault's points, in my opinion the guidelines had been given to the clerk by the House. It's not within the jurisdiction of the health committee to refine, change or embellish them. The motion that was passed in the House of Commons is clear.
I will end by saying to respect the integrity of the process and the integrity of the law clerk's office. The motion has been passed. It's in the law clerk's hands, and we should leave it in his hands to comply with the motion. If the law clerk has any questions, I'm not even sure the questions would be properly directed to the health committee, since the motion was not passed by the health committee but by the House of Commons itself.