Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
I think Ms. Rempel Garner beat me to the punch, but I would like to make an amendment to Ms. Rempel Garner's motion. Also, after listening to Mr. Davies outline the number of meetings we have, I think he makes a good point that we have a limited amount of time, and now we're talking about the PMPRB study as well.
I'm wondering if I can make an amendment to Ms. Rempel Garner's motion. Instead of inviting the law clerk for the two hours, or for one hour just for a separate meeting, I suggest we invite the law clerk to be part of a witness panel in the first meeting we have as part of the COVID study. I think this would save us that additional health committee meeting but still give us an opportunity to ask questions of the law clerk, which is something I am quite interested in. I don't have a lot of experience dealing with the law clerk. I would certainly like the opportunity to ask a couple of questions on how the process works and what requires being redacted and what does not from someone of the law clerk's experience, who is an independent official without any political connections or political influences. I would be interested in that opportunity.
My motion would be to amend the motion of Ms. Rempel Garner so that rather than having the law clerk as a lone witness for one hour at a committee meeting, the law clerk would be invited to be a member of a panel on the first meeting that we have to study the COVID-19 motion.