Thank you, Monsieur Thériault. Ms. Rempel Garner's amendment did not pass, so that's not relevant anymore. The motion by Mr. Davies, as it stands, is silent on the actual scheduling of the meetings. It speaks to the number of meetings and the priority of how to direct each meeting to a particular topic, but the actual allocation of time is not in the motion.
We go now to Mr. Powlowski. Please go ahead.