Thank you.
I tend to agree with the previous statement. I'd also just say that if we truly want more time for our witnesses, and we can all agree to that, we also all mutually agree to try to keep our questions short, because we've all been in meetings before where the question takes up more than half of the allotted time.
If we truly do want to hear from our witnesses, that's an accommodation that we can all agree to in good faith. I agree that five minutes is enough and that our chair is compassionate and will not necessarily cut people off, but it's almost never the case that we get through that 59-minute period in a 60-minute stretch.