I wanted to add that we often invite an organization. It seems that we could give that organization seven minutes rather than having all the people with the organization speak.
Sometimes, we think that we're saving time. However, when a witness doesn't cover the whole topic in their presentation, we have to ask them questions to clarify what they could have said in their presentation. This prevents us from asking them further questions.
In the Standing Committee on Health, we've been through the first, second, third and fourth waves. The people who have tracked this whole process have taken courses. Everyone may have a PhD in public health and, in a way, epidemiology at times. Of course, there are computer tools such as Zoom, but sometimes it's hard to get witnesses to leave work to come talk to us for five minutes.
When we have four people at the table, they don't all need to speak when they're from the same organization. I think that it would be good to consider seven minutes per organization or per specialist. That's why I would make some adjustments to my colleague Mr. Davies' comments on this matter.
I invite the committee members to vote, since the discretion of the chair is guaranteed in any case. We can make adjustments afterwards.