That's a wise question, and you've hit the nail on the head. I think it would go tremendously far.
What you've heard about today from all of us—and again, it's lovely to be on this panel with so many people we respect and who are all working toward the same goals—is that yes, there are things that just make sense to everyone, I'm sure, who is in the room there. There are things that are actually scientifically validated, that resonate with patients but are not universally implemented and are needing that guidance of what we call a knowledge translation and making sure people understand the value of it. Whether you lead them with a carrot or a stick or you set out guidelines that have to be followed, those are what help enable things to happen.
I'm incredibly distressed that a patient who is a 10-hour drive from me may have a conversation with their physician that is different from the one I have with the patient around the corner. I think we do a very good job of centralized care in cancer centres, but there are still challenges. There are differences in communities' awareness of disease and how to treat it, and I think national guidelines would go tremendously far in helping to say that this is the gold standard and let's all try to rise up to it.