Thank you.
I am going to take issue with two of your earlier comments.
I do think, actually, that this issue has been punted down the road. It was punted down the road by two years with the Senate amendment. It was further punted down the road by one year of Bill C-39. Now we're looking at a three-year punt.
I also take issue.... I've been on the special joint committee since its inception. I agree with the recommendation that we put forward, but we did not have anywhere near enough of a time frame to study this issue in depth. We had three meetings of three hours each.
How can you say that this is not punting it down the road? How can you say that the special joint committee had adequate time when in fact we did not?