We are. That's precisely my point. There's a large number of them who disagree with what you're saying. They say that the system is not ready, so I'm doing precisely that.
My last point, while I have a few seconds, is this. In terms of safeguarding people's rights, does that not include people who might make a decision at a stage when it could be premature and who might potentially recover?
There are rights on both sides of the equation. It's not a one-sided issue. That's one of the challenges I have with this discussion. People pick one side or the other, but it's not black and white. When it comes to people protecting the rights of individuals, you have to look at both sides of the discussion. Is that not fair?