Absolutely.
I think we've heard references to the CMAJ paper a couple of times. I would like to reiterate that the CMAJ paper showed 50% reduction in poor medical outcomes and 50% reduction in cost only from safe supply prescribing.
Since then, we've been able to add the wraparound care. In my experience, we are seeing people do so much better. There is a glass ceiling on how well I can make people when they are not housed. We help them find housing. There's a glass ceiling when they're on social assistance and can't afford enough food to eat. We provide people with food security. I could go on and on.
We are planning to repeat that study to look at the impacts of wraparound care on people receiving safe supply—not just a prescription, but the entire program—and we have every expectation that it's going to show even better outcomes, because we're seeing this every single day with the people we serve.