I have a quick question. When the courts look at child custody, the best interests of the child come first, but certainly, we have heard today of the trauma to the mother of losing a child. When the courts establish that balance between the interests of the parent and the interests of the child, do you think they are generally doing that right? Second, does that balance change according to whether you're indigenous or non-indigenous?
Having said that, let me quickly say that as a medical practitioner, you see people who have a real drinking disorder coming to emergency all the time with high levels of alcohol. They are homeless. You tell them that they're killing themselves, and they say they know. You ask why, and often losing a child is, in my experience, one of the most common things you hear.
Do the courts get the balance right? I know this is very difficult for the courts, but is there a difference between indigenous and non-indigenous cases?