It concerns me because it should be possible for a piece of legislation to be read as a stand-alone entity and be understood. While we have, effectively, a four-page pamphlet that is quite light, this is billed by the government as being quite substantive, although we have heard conversation that it's effectively a pilot. I'm not quite sure what we're actually dealing with here.
What's the rush? Was it just because of the timeline of the supply and confidence agreement? Is that why this legislation looks like it was basically pieced together?