Again, it depends on the medication and the jurisdiction.
I would put it back to you. If you are going to vote against something, my proposition would be that you have to explain what you're going to do in its place. If you have all of these folks who have no insurance or medication, it's a pretty simple question to ask back: What are you going to do in its place? If you say you have no answer, I would ask you why you are voting against this.