I think that's a fair characterization. We have to work it out for each province, but the idea is that you would have choice.
Somebody who has existing coverage can continue to use that coverage. For somebody who doesn't have coverage or is under-insured, this would give them a path towards coverage.
There are a lot of folks who are under-insured. Somebody may only have 70% coverage for their medicine, as an example, and can't afford the 30% copayment. That means they're not getting the medicine they need, which means they don't adhere to a regime of taking that medication, which means they wind up with a chronic disease, which means they end up in our hospital system, which costs us an enormous amount of money.
It's more than social justice. It's critical that those people have access to a choice. That is what this measure is going to do. It's going to open up a choice about whether you want to use your existing insurance or go with the single-payer universal system.