Thank you, Mr. Chair.
We will be also voting against this motion, because I think the language is fairly clear in the bill when it talks about consistency in Canada. To me, what is meant is very clear from a statutory drafting perspective. Adding anything more to it, as is being suggested, is redundant and doesn't add any more clarity whatsoever.
The way we see the wording is appropriate. Therefore, there's no need for this amendment.
Thank you.