We know that, in certain sections, if a woman has not borne a child or has not gone through a full pregnancy, that may be one of the reasons or may be one of the screenings. To me, it just seems so simple for stage one. You sit there and think about how you haven't had a child yet or haven't nursed, so perhaps screening before 40 or screening after 40 would make sense.
That's why I'm thinking that it could be such a simple thing if you're just able to go through it at the very first step, because we know of the full-term pregnancies....
You said, or it could have been Dr. Gordon, that 85% of women do not have a history of breast cancer in their family. When we're looking at trying to do this testing, what kinds of things would they be looking at? Is it a blood test for screening, or would they be looking at a genetic issue?