As I mentioned, I've been at odds scientifically with the various task forces since 2011. I've found that they've been very resistant to receiving information from experts like me, Dr. Kulkarni, Dr. Seely and others who are aware of and very familiar with the scientific literature in the area. Instead, they've focused narrowly on the old studies because they're randomized trials. That's a great way of doing a study, but they're so old that they're not relevant.
I may have drifted a bit from your question. If you don't mind, just repeat the last part of it. I want to make sure I answer you.