I will ask a question that has not been asked yet during our meetings.
Every specialist and expert who comes to see us, including the representatives from the Canadian Cancer Society, tell us that there needs to be systematic screening between 40 and 49.
Why did the working group decide to set aside this advice? Is there a financial aspect, for better or worse, tied to that, even though I hear that this could save us a lot of money? What do you think? Why are these people insisting on this?