You said earlier that, if there's no way to reach these people, that means work at the community level needs to be done. For example, people on the front lines who are dedicated to harm reduction seek out contact with addicts to address their social determinants.
When we did a tour, we noticed that the good stories, the ones with happy endings, always started with supervised housing, among other things. Individuals are given a roof over their head and the right to supervised consumption. Gradually, these individuals were able to control their addiction. Having a fixed address enabled them to find a job and, over time, break the addiction.
That path seems much more difficult, and it can take a long time. Do you think it's better than something like forced detox?