No, it wouldn't be accurate at all, Mr. Hanley.
Mr. Buckley has his own opinions about things. I had a bill drafted by the legislative drafters here. I asked Mr. Buckley if he would send me what he thought the bill should be. When he sent me his bill, it looked virtually identical to what the legislative drafters here at the House of Commons presented to me.
To suggest that I work for Mr. Buckley would be not only wrong.... As a matter of fact, the first contact I had with Mr. Buckley was when I asked him to send me what he thought the bill should be. That's when I compared. He has experience as a legislative drafter previously in his career, but I believe you'll have plenty of time to cross-examine Mr. Buckley.
Look, Health Canada already has more powers than its ability to recall. The industry is asked many times to have product recalls. I'm not aware of anybody in the industry having refused a voluntary recall, but let's review the powers that Health Canada had before Bill C-47.
They had the ability to stop a sale. That would stop the problem with the Ayurvedic medicine that you're talking about. They have border power for personal-use imports, where they have the ability to seize any product that they want. They can revoke a site licence for any of the sites that would have had Ayurvedic medicine that was being sent out. That includes manufacturers, packages and labels, and importers. They can mandate a label change any time they want and add any warnings they want to products. They can inspect any site licence. They can inspect any product. They approved every natural product number that's out there, and they can revoke a natural product number and cancel the product.
If it's not being done—