It was garlic and hot peppers.
This young couple was charged in Lethbridge, Alberta, in the death of their son because they failed to do what was right. They used natural health products.
The reason I'm bringing this up is that the young boy did not die from the use of natural health products—he died because he had viral meningitis and he died from lack of oxygen—but the chief medical adviser stated this case as a prime example as to why Bill C-47 was so needed. Despite my multiple attempts to give her the opportunity—I was very familiar with this case—to correct the record, she refused to do so.
Mr. Calkins, why do you feel the chief medical adviser would have done that?