Thanks very much, Chair.
Thanks, everybody, for being here. I have just a couple of comments.
First of all, Mr. Fallu talked about depoliticizing the situation. I would draw everybody's attention to a social media post in May that reads, “Hey everyone, @PierrePoilievre is a #PublicDanger. He is way more toxic for society than all drugs.” That doesn't sound like depoliticizing this incredibly important debate to me.
That being said, Ms. Krupp, thank you very much for your testimony. I had a chance to read it, and I really appreciate your being here. I apologize for not being able to be here right away.
We talked a little bit about methadone and, of course, the tragedy that happened in your family related to methadone. I once was a family physician and had a licence to prescribe methadone. At that time, it was necessary to prove your competence as a prescriber before you were allowed to prescribe methadone. In my reading, those regulations changed in 2017.
In your mind, if that regulation continued to exist, would that have changed the outcome in your family if you had a competent prescriber?