I'm not changing my vote.
I very much understand and think the difference between “must” and “may” is highly significant. However, in defence of Mr. Naqvi, I think all these measures listed would certainly be part of a brain injury strategy. I don't think that the government or Mr. Naqvi, in using the word “may”, put it in there to try to give the government flexibility to take some of these things out, because without these things, it would basically be a pretty hollow bill.
I do not think that's at all the intent of Mr. Naqvi's recommendations, but I do appreciate the difference. I think the importance of using.... I'm kind of surprised that it's not “shall”, but “must” is okay with me, and I would prefer to leave that in.