I'll turn to officials for the exact number; I can say that there's largely been compliance. The concern is that when there isn't, we lack the ability to do anything about it. As you could appreciate, if there is a really flagrant violation—and I just gave you an example of one right here that was very flagrant, and there are other examples that are flagrant—and if we don't have the ability in court to have a penalty that's commensurate with the size of what they did.... For example, you know, you may only have a very small number of cases where somebody commits a crime, but you still need a mechanism to deal with it when they do commit a crime. That deterrent effect is extremely important, and our ability to protect consumers when there is a flagrant violation is extremely important.
I don't know if you want to speak to the specific number.