It's a great question. Of course, it isn't fair, and it is dangerous.
Moreover, I've had the opportunity to meet with all kinds of companies, and what they tell me is that they want a fair and level playing field. I think it's deeply unfair to create a circumstance whereby good actors that respond quickly to stop-sale orders and voluntarily comply are left to compete with companies that don't. That's what would happen here. If you're a bad actor, all you'd face is a $5,000 fine. That's a cost of doing business. Basically, you can operate however out of control you want, and we're put in the terrible position of trying to comply and create fairness.
I can tell you that the companies I talk to don't want that. We have a lot of fantastic Canadian companies employing people and growing their business to multiple billions of dollars. What they're asking for is to make sure that Health Canada has the powers to keep a level playing field so that the good actors—the ones trying to keep people safe, be a good business and have good business practices—aren't put in a disadvantaged position because there are weak regulations to deal with bad actors. That's what this is about. To me, that's fundamentally fair.