I'm going to start by saying—and I think I speak on behalf of Aaron and myself, all of our members, and probably all of industry and us around this table—that we are pretty shocked to see that, on one hand, we're being said to be, and you are being told that this is, a very compliant, very co-operative industry, but then, on the other hand, the worst-case scenario in the past 20 years of this regulatory system is used to shame and stain a Canadian industry, one that we are all very proud of. We've all worked very hard to get it to where it is. I'll start by saying that.
As for the situation we believe he was referring to, I don't know, because they didn't say the name, but I think we do know because, like I said, it was the worst case. I will say that although that happened since 2023, since Vanessa's Law was passed, since the definition was changed, that situation was resolved using the powers they already had previously. The site licence was suspended for 30 days. The company was given a chance to course correct. It submitted its course correction to Health Canada. Health Canada didn't accept it, and the company's licence was cancelled. That worked.
I just find it a bit surprising that what is used to justify the need for this omnibus bill.... This omnibus bill's powers were not even used in that situation.