Yes, that was my understanding.
Even before the ministerial order, you were making those recommendations and using those products. Essentially, you trusted those products.
If we amended Bill C‑368 to maintain the minister's recall powers, would the bill be valid from your perspective?
What I'm trying to do is bring these different strands together to find commonalities. Vanessa's Law would not have been passed if there hadn't been issues with pharmaceutical products. You've been using those forever. There is no such thing as no risk. Pharmaceutical companies' products have many more side effects, which can be more serious and undesirable.
Why should an industry be considered on the same footing as pharmaceutical companies?
Would this amendment deal with this issue, in your opinion? The minister would retain recall powers, and we would make an amendment for nicotine products.
Would the parents you're talking about find that reassuring?