I don't think we have time to really talk about the ethics involved and the process involved in developing a research study. Certainly, anything that is research from a health lens, particularly with vulnerable populations, which include people who use drugs and people with substance-use disorders, has high levels of scrutiny for acceptability.
One of the issues that we pointed out in that paper that you reference is that there is such poor description of what was included in involuntary treatment studies that we can't even pull reasonable learnings from most of the studies, because they don't tell us what they did other than putting people in a place where they didn't want to be. Anything that looks at involuntary treatment and attempts to study involuntary treatment in a more robust, evidence-based and scientific way needs to look at the implementation of evidence-based treatment as part of that involuntary treatment, so that we can see whether or not outcomes are favourable.