I'm pleased to see you all here, but my questions are for Dr. Vigo. I think some of them were your remarks. I'm not sure if they're only your remarks, but I understand you're the chief scientific adviser for psychiatry and toxic drugs in B.C. and, certainly, within the popular press the message came out that British Columbia was contemplating more involuntary treatment of patients. I wonder whether you could explain your ideas about involuntary treatment. My understanding is, and this is for a population of...you already talked about the triad, people who have substance abuse disorder, mental health issues and acquired brain injury altogether. Certainly, my understanding is that, under present psychiatric law, there is the ability to involuntarily admit and treat people who require long-term antipsychotics. Is that what you were contemplating using more in B.C.?
The other component of that is I think there was something about clarifying the issue of being able to use OAT, like sublocade, for people who were also receiving long-term antipsychotics. Maybe you could just clarify for us the whole issue of involuntary treatment, who should get it and whether that should be expanded.