If I'm allowed to finish, the point I'm making is that these people get way more back in a rebate cheque that they can use for food insecurity. You would take that away from them.
In other words, in terms of the price on pollution, you would eliminate the action on pollution and protecting our climate, and you would then take away money that they get, and they would be left in an even more insecure situation.
I think it's disingenuous to say to somebody who's suffering that you're going to take away money that they need.