Thank you, Mr. Chair.
The fact that an amendment has been tabled by my colleague Mr. van Koeverden means that we're actually debating the motion that our colleague Mr. Lake put forward regarding the emergency hotline.
I need clarification. Are we on the motion that Mr. Lake put forward and now we have an amendment to the motion, and when we are voting on that, we are specifically debating and voting on the motion and therefore the amendment to the motion? Or, have we broadened the scope and we're talking about other studies?
I ask because I believe that the intervention made by our colleague MP Barrett mentioned other studies beyond the motion by our other Conservative colleague. The motion that was moved by our colleague MP Lake had a very specific scope. My understanding was that we were debating that motion, and I believe that assumption proved to be fact when our colleague MP van Koeverden moved an amendment to that motion.
I would like to get some clarification. I'll personally be supporting the amendment to the motion that's been put forward for the emergency hotline, as well as the amendment itself.