Thank you.
For clarity, I wasn't trying to reduce this to the one thing we can do to solve this massive problem. I was just trying to get an idea of whether we're thinking that 80% of the problem could be solved with these two or three, and then the rest would be sort of rounding errors. But I take the point that it's probably not. We don't know, quite frankly, what the solutions will be until we start employing and engaging them.
I read a relevant reflection this weekend about something totally different, namely that we have all of the solutions and we just have to deploy the solutions. It's not a matter of coming up with new ideas for fighting climate change or creating solutions for human health care resources, or the lack thereof. It's a matter of deploying them.
I have a question regarding the training. Obviously this would be months and years down the road, so it wouldn't address the problem in the next six months. But would more scholarships for people entering this education be a little bit of a cart before the horse type of thing because there are not enough positions?
It also occurs to me that in most lines of work now, there is the capacity to have more people than desks, which could possibly be true, as well, in nursing. We have fewer desks here that could hold everybody in the meeting, but we're managing. So perhaps nursing schools and colleges could be training higher than a general capacity.
Would new scholarships and bursaries for future students encourage more people to get involved?