I actually don't have a lot of familiarity with the last piece of that. I think that's really a political decision. Hopefully, families are encouraged and the funds do go to what they do, but I will say that in terms of the actual money flowing, what I'm perceiving from my perspective is that this is not always a case of more funding. I know this is not politically astute to say—I'm not a politician.
What I will say is that often it's about the service delivery models being dislocated. So much of what my colleagues here have said today is about whether we could be better at co-locating services, as some initiatives nationally have done. I can certainly give you some details on those later.
The largest problem is that we have lots of money floating around, but it is incredibly wasted in many cases. It is not coordinated, and children and parents have to get to multiple domains to get services—rather than us thinking from the point of view of the families and putting those services together so that indeed this would be more cost-effective and we'd be catching more of these pathologies earlier.
It's a systems problem, in part, and not just basically throwing more and more money at these problems.