Mr. Chair, I think it is important to point out two things.
First, this is not a precedent that was created in a number of committees, but rather a motion adopted in the House that pertains to a broader study carried out by the Standing Committee on Health, which called for an equal number of witnesses during the first hour and stakeholders during the second hour. We just need everyone to have the same understanding of the situation. This is not a precedent or a habit of the Standing Committee on Health. It is not part of the Standing Committee on Health's tradition to adopt this kind of a motion.
Second, in order for us to move forward, I think it would be a good idea to try out this work method in this first study, which concerns children's health. That will enable us to see whether we can work like this and to note the results. That is why it is important for us to adopt this motion not for all studies, but for this study alone, to see how this approach works.
Mr. Chair, I have no issue with Mr. Davies' amendment concerning this specific study. I propose that we adopt this motion, which will help us move forward and will help the analysts in their work. We can plan to begin studies like this, and then we could continue prioritizing, as next week will come quickly, and we will have to have a topic to study next Wednesday.