I have just a couple of quick points. First, again, I just really want to reassure Mr. Lake that nobody is talking about attaching names to witnesses. We're simply talking about the process for funnelling names to the clerk, and that meant applicable witnesses who will testify. There are no labels attached to anybody.
I'm having difficulty understanding my Conservative colleagues' arguments, because they have interchangeably argued that this is a fundamental offence to the Westminster system, at the same time that Mr. Berthold has publicly acknowledged that he was prepared to agree to it with respect to the Conservative study on child health. We're simply talking about doing the same thing for a different study. I thought Mr. van Koeverden was very persuasive and eloquent in that. Nobody is asking to get married here. We're talking about a study and attempting to have a fair allotment of witnesses.
My final question is this. If we want to find out who's doing the filibustering and who's not, then let's go to a vote right now. [Technical difficulty—Editor] ultimately here's the basis of the Westminster system—we settle the issues by majority vote. If the Conservatives believe in the Westminster system and you're not doing the filibuster, then I look forward to there being silence after I speak, and let's go to a vote.