That is clear enough for me. Thank you, Mr. Davies.
I will read the amendment and then I will read the motion as it would be amended.
Mr. Davies moved to add after the words “that the committee hold a minimum of eight (8) meetings with witnesses on this study” the following words “and each party be entitled to an equal amount of witnesses”. So the motion, if it were amended, would read as follows:
“That, pursuant to Standing Order 108(2), the committee, in recognition of exhaustion and burnout amongst healthcare professionals, undertake a study on how the federal government can facilitate the recruitment and retention of physicians, nurses, nurse practitioners and other health care providers to the public healthcare system; including a focus on rural and northern communities. That this study be prioritized by the House of Commons Standing Committee on Health in the 44th Parliament. That the committee invite experts and representatives to appear; that the committee hold a minimum of eight (8) meetings with witnesses on this study; that this study be prioritized by the House of Commons Standing Committee on Health in the 44th Parliament, that the committee present its findings and recommendations to the House; and that pursuant to Standing Order 109, the committee request a comprehensive response to the report by the government.”