You're absolutely right. The CIHI study was a really important study. It was done in the last few years, I would say. We're hoping to get the information updated.
On the complexities, that top 1% of them—you're absolutely right—takes up a huge component of the dollars. In terms of thinking about how we work with families, there are not well-established programs. There's not a lot of data. As I listen to my colleagues, I see that there's a huge issue with regard to data with our population.
Certainly, those families may be supported in the acute care sector. That's why they go back to a lot of the hospitals: We don't have well-established continuum-of-care supports. Families need to have stronger supports in the community. They need help to understand how to cope in the community so that we're using our health care system—acute care for acute care—and have well-established home- and community-based care, where families then can cope.
Right now, with the way the system is, we don't have that cross-continuum support. That's what I've been advocating for so that we have an established system of care across, outside of hospitals, and so families don't have to go to the hospital and, to your point, so parents can access services in the community as opposed to going to an emergency department.